f (1).JPG
IMG_0402.JPG
IXRV6619.PNG
IMG_0402.JPG
TNUY0382.PNG
IMG_0402.JPG

But then, in 2001, "No Child Left Behind" gave power to THE ELITE:  the "experts," bureaucracies, central offices and corporations who treat classrooms as laboratories and public education money as their SLUSH FUND.
 

IMG_0402.JPG
IMG_1741.JPG
IMG_0402.JPG
f (16).JPG
IMG_0402.JPG
f (17).JPG
IMG_0402.JPG
f (18).JPG
IMG_0402.JPG

NCLB tied the hands of our elected leaders and gave all the power to the unelected State Departments of Education.

IMG_0402.JPG
f (32).JPG
IMG_0402.JPG
f (34).JPG
IMG_0402.JPG

S. 1177  One Hundred Fourteenth Congress of the United States of America

 and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, the sixth day of January, two thousand and fifteen

An Act To reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to ensure that every child achieves.

 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Every Student Succeeds Act’’.

SEC. 8526A. PROHIBITION AGAINST FEDERAL MANDATES, DIRECTION, OR CONTROL.

(a) IN GENERAL.—No officer or employee of the Federal Government shall, through grants, contracts, or other cooperative agreements, mandate, direct, or control a State, local educational agency, or school’s specific instructional content, academic standards and assessments, curricula, or program of instruction developed and implemented to meet the requirements of this Act (including any requirement, direction, or mandate to adopt the Common Core State Standards developed under the Common Core State Standards Initiative, any other academic standards common to a significant number of States, or any assessment, instructional content, or curriculum aligned to such standards), nor shall anything in this Act be construed to authorize such officer or employee to do so.

SEC. 8549A SENSE OF CONGRESS.

(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds as follows:

(1) This Act prohibits the Federal Government from mandating, directing, or controlling a State, local educational agency, or school’s curriculum, program of instruction, or allocation of State and local resources, and from mandating a State or any subdivision thereof to spend any funds or incur any costs not paid for under this Act.

(2) This Act prohibits the Federal Government from funding the development, pilot testing, field testing, implementation, administration, or distribution of any federally sponsored national test in reading, mathematics, or any other subject, unless specifically and explicitly authorized by law.

(b) SENSE OF  CONGRESS — It is the sense of the Congress that States and local educational agencies retain the rights and responsibilities of determining educational curriculum, programs of instruction, and assessments for elementary and secondary education.

IMG_0402.JPG
DPAA5446.PNG
IMG_0402.JPG

That's right.

But did anything change since 2015?

 

Or did the establishment convince you that ESSA simply limited the testing to 2% of the school year?

f (43).JPG
IMG_0402.JPG
f (50).JPG
IMG_0402.JPG
f (51).JPG
IMG_0402.JPG
f (52).JPG
IMG_0402.JPG
f (53).JPG
IMG_0402.JPG

There might be hope this November.

You might have a

candidate who would free schools from onerous, wasteful NCLB bureaucracy......

IMG_0402.JPG
EARF7588.PNG
IMG_0402.JPG

Running against an incumbent who has ignored ESSA freedoms.

IMG_0402.JPG
HUSU1072.PNG
IMG_0402.JPG
f (54).JPG
NWPA3775.PNG
IMG_0402.JPG
IMG_0402.JPG
XTKI4995.PNG
IMG_0402.JPG

I bet right now you have candidates who aren't even talking about the wasteful NCLB burdens that are still wrecking our public schools.

But YOU can get them talking.

IMG_0402.JPG

Private schools choose norm-referenced, paper and pencil assessments like the TerraNova3 (the re-named CAT) to evaluate their students and programs. 

 

They never use the State Exams. 

 

If public schools answered to the parents, like the private schools do, then specially constructed state tests would not be forced on our children. 

Public school students deserve no less respect for their time, resources and meaningful evaluation than private school students get.

What a racket!  Who benefits from every state creating it's own testing program (CAASPP, FSA, MCAP, STAAR, CMAS, ISAT, IAR, OST, OSTP, WY-TOPP, AASA, PSSA, etc.)? 

 

The sole-source contractors, education elite and bureaucracies who are running the programs benefit.

 

The students, teachers, taxpayers and anyone who really cares to assess how schools are performing, especially compared to schools in other states, loses.

IMG_0402.JPG
OAYO5236.PNG
IMG_0402.JPG
SDQW1538.PNG
IMG_0402.JPG

SEC. 1005. STATE PLANS. (a) (2) (H) (i) ACADEMIC ASSESSMENTS

Section 1111 (20 U.S.C. 6311) is amended to read as follows:

(H) LOCALLY -SELECTED ASSESSMENT .—

(i) IN GENERAL .—Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to prohibit a local educational agency from administering a locally-selected assessment in lieu of the State-designed academic assessment

IMG_0402.JPG
HYUK7961.PNG

and has had that power since 2015.

IMG_0402.JPG
f (69).JPG
IMG_0402.JPG
f (70).JPG
IMG_0402.JPG
f (71).JPG
IMG_0402.JPG
f (72).JPG
IMG_0402.JPG
f (73).JPG
IMG_0402.JPG
f (74).JPG
IMG_0402.JPG
f (75).JPG
f (76).JPG
IMG_0402.JPG
IMG_0402.JPG
f (77).JPG
f (65).JPG
IMG_0402.JPG
f (78).JPG
IMG_0402.JPG
f (79).JPG
IMG_0402.JPG
f (80).JPG
f (81).JPG

Quick - share this OneDayInMay.org story with a friend - if enough people knew the truth, the travesty couldn't continue. 

Once you've shared OneDayInMay.org, click the button below to learn more or use the menu to navigate the site.